International arbitration in 2025
The internationalization of arbitration in Brazil: a rising trend
By Nigel Blackaby KC, Yuri Mantilla, Matheus Bastos Oliveira and Gabriela Jung
In brief
São Paulo is emerging as a new contender among the traditionally preferred international arbitration seats of Paris, London, Geneva, New York and Singapore particularly where large Brazilian corporates are involved. With its pro-arbitration legal framework, and local offices of leading international institutions such as the ICC, São Paulo is increasingly being selected over those traditional seats for international cases with a Brazilian angle. This trend has multiple implications, with the most notable being the increasing internationalization of arbitrations seated in Brazil.
Looking ahead, this trend is expected to drive greater participation by foreign actors and international practices in Brazil’s arbitration procedures, fostering growth and enhancing the sophistication of the Brazilian arbitration landscape.
Title
Internationalization of arbitrations in Brazil: evidence and drivers
Brazil consistently ranks among the top countries for arbitration in ICC statistics, with São Paulo leading as the preferred seat domestically. This prominence has been historically driven by a significant volume of domestic arbitrations, but this trend is shifting.
Between 2017 and 2022, ICC statistics revealed that total number of arbitrations administered in Brazil (approximately 30 annually) were comparable to those ICC cases solely involving Brazilian parties. These figures were still lower than the number all ICC cases globally involving at least one Brazilian party (around 50 annually) or those applying Brazilian law (approximately 40 annually), which suggests that many international cases connected to Brazil were still being seated elsewhere.
The landscape shifted in 2023, with ICC statistics showing that arbitrations seated in Brazil (34) outnumbered those applying Brazilian law (29) and those involving only Brazilian parties (21). Also in 2023, the number of Brazilian nationals appointed as arbitrators dropped (from 90–130 in prior years to 60), reflecting a growing demand for foreign arbitrators in Brazil-seated arbitrations.
This shift towards internationalization is echoed by other statistics and developments. The CAM-CCBC, a leading Brazilian arbitration institution, reported an increase of foreign party participation in its 2023 cases (although Brazilian entities continue to represent the vast majority of parties). Further, a 2024 study of arbitrations administered by major Brazilian institutions revealed an increase of approximately 20 percent in cases arising from international contracts between 2022 and 2023. And in January 2025, Brazil put in force an agreement to host a branch of the Permanent Court of Arbitration. This move further solidifies Brazil’s growing prominence as a key venue for international arbitration.
This internationalization of Brazil-seated arbitration shows no signs of slowing, mostly driven by two key factors. Firstly, in the wake of post-pandemic economic constraints, the Brazilian government has revitalized infrastructure development through the Novo PAC, a program targeting BRL 1.7tn (US$320bn) in key infrastructure and energy projects over the coming years. This initiative, along with the current landscape of the Brazilian economy, is expected to attract substantial foreign investment in sectors like construction and M&A, which heavily rely on arbitration.
By embracing internationalization, Brazil’s arbitration landscape benefits from diverse perspectives and global standards. This enhances procedural quality and cements Brazil’s role as a key player in the international dispute resolution community.
Yuri Mantilla
Senior Associate
Second, Brazil continues to foster an arbitration-friendly legal environment, supported by skilled practitioners who often team up with leading international firms to provide the best defense for their clients. This environment is exemplified by a recent Brazilian Superior Court ruling affirming arbitration autonomy by holding that, unless explicitly agreed by the parties, the Brazilian Civil Procedure Code does not apply to arbitrations seated in Brazil. This decision reinforces the foreseeability of arbitration proceedings in Brazil, strengthening its appeal to international parties seeking efficient and reliable dispute resolution.
Looking ahead: the impact on arbitral practice
In our experience, the internationalization of arbitration in Brazil has driven key changes in the following areas:
Language of the procedure: in cross-border negotiation and disputes involving parties from countries with different languages, such as Chinese and Portuguese, English is overwhelmingly selected as the default common language. This preference is increasingly prominent in international arbitrations, including those seated in Brazil, as foreign parties seek neutral linguistic ground. As Brazil attracts more international players in arbitration, the use of English in these proceedings is expected to rise further. Our team participated in a major international arbitration this year under Brazilian law with a São Paulo seat where the proceedings were conducted in English and two of the three arbitrators (including the chair) were non-Brazilian.
Arbitrator selection: a hallmark of international arbitrations is the diversity of arbitrators’ nationalities. In cross-border disputes, parties often prioritize diversity when selecting arbitrators, considering factors such as cultural and legal backgrounds and experience in handling international cases. In arbitrations under Brazilian law, foreign parties often prioritize arbitrators’ nationality and international experience, valuing familiarity with diverse legal traditions and cross-border complexities over detailed knowledge of Brazilian law. This preference, coupled with an already-stretched pool of available local arbitrators, has increased the number of tribunals seated in Brazil featuring arbitrators of diverse nationalities, bringing broader perspectives and expertise. Additionally, institutions like the ICC and CAM-CCBC, active in Brazil, include rules that promote the appointment of sole arbitrators and tribunal Presidents who do not share the parties’ nationalities, further encouraging the selection of foreign arbitrators. This emphasis on diverse nationalities is increasingly evident in arbitrations seated in Brazil, highlighting the country’s rising prominence in international arbitration and integrating global perspectives and practices into its dispute resolution framework.
Procedural rules: one of the most notable impacts of arbitration’s internationalization in Brazil is the evolution of procedural rules towards international standards. Given that international arbitration has evolved largely within a common law framework, its procedures often differ significantly from those of Brazil’s civil law system. The growing involvement of foreign parties, arbitrators, experts, and counsel in Brazilian arbitrations has driven a notable shift towards international practices previously uncommon in Brazil. This shift is reflected in the increasing use of written witness statements, the adoption of broader document discovery procedures, and the application of privilege rules different from those traditionally applied to Brazilian counsel. Although specific procedural rules vary based on party agreements and the tribunal’s discretion, this convergence towards international rules is likely to enhance Brazil’s appeal as a venue for resolving cross-border disputes.
We've seen a notable shift towards international practices previously uncommon in Brazil, such as the use of written witness statements and the adoption of broader document discovery procedures. That brings new features to legal representation and case strategy in Brazilian-seated cases.
Matheus Bastos Oliveira
Senior Associate
Experts and counsel: the internationalization of arbitration in Brazil has also fueled an increased demand for specialized expertise. While Brazilian practitioners are undoubtedly skilled and experienced in handling complex international disputes, the unique challenges of high-stakes cross-border proceedings often necessitate a multi-faceted approach.
Parties have increasingly engaged international experts and counsel in addition to their local counsel. This international perspective can add valuable insights and experience with diverse legal systems, procedural norms and customary international standards, and may be more familiar with arbitrators from varied cultural and legal backgrounds.
The internationalization of arbitration in Brazil has fuelled a demand for specialized expertise, leading to increased collaboration between Brazilian and international firms, with parties engaging diverse counsel and experts to navigate the complexities of high-stakes cross-border proceedings.
Nigel Blackaby KC
Partner
This increasing collaboration between leading Brazilian and international law firms generates synergies that foster a deeper understanding of the nuances of both Brazilian and international practices, ultimately enhancing the quality of legal representation and facilitating the effective resolution of complex cross-border disputes. This trend underscores the growing connection of the global arbitration community and highlights the value of cross-border collaboration in navigating Brazil’s internationalized arbitration landscape. Unlike some other jurisdictions, the sophistication of the Brazilian arbitration bar usually results in a true partnership of equals where each firm focuses on areas where they add most value and both firms are involved in designing overall case strategy.
Our team has significant expertise resolving disputes in Brazil. Please reach out to us if you would like to discuss in the context of your business.
- Introduction
- 1. AI in international arbitration: a fast-evolving landscape
- 2. Geopolitical shifts: new political agendas driving investment treaty claims
- 3. Russian disputes and anti-suit injunctions: arbitration and state courts - allies, adversaries, or both?
- 4. Investor-state mediation: a bridge over troubled waters?
- 5. Human rights and social issues in investment treaty arbitration: a growing trend
- 6. Arbitration as a tool for private capital disputes
- 7. Arbitration of space disputes: time for take-off
- 8. Game-changing sports disputes: a new normal
- 9. Privilege in arbitration – should one set of rules apply?
- 10. The shift from EPC to EPCM: a recipe for more complex arbitrations?
- 11. The internationalization of arbitration in Brazil: a rising trend
- 12. Shifting sands: the Middle East’s evolution into an arbitration hub